Navigation
You Ought to Know
RightMenu Breaking News on Verdult Art Verdult Art Financing Your Verdult Art Hot Deals On Verdult Art Publications About Verdult Value of your Verdult Features Joining Yazzy's Mailing List Art Gallery Owner's Forum Art News on the Net
Search our Site!
Subscribe
The Insider
Right Menu Archive - Art News RSS Feed Community the Insider
Yazzy's Newsletter Free Stuff Archives - Home Archive - Features
Media, Money, and Museum Kit: 7 Power Packed Books
Recall - Certificate of Authenticity IRS Appraisals for Verdult Art
advertisement
« Sender Skips Miami Parties, Buys Art as Hedge Fund Gains 53% , Yazzy's at www.williamverdult.com | Main | Reacp: Sotheby's, Christie's Report $128 Million in Old-Master Sales »
Tuesday
Dec112007

Recap: Caution: Art Afoot, Yazzy's at www.williamverdult.com

crack190.jpgAccording to the New York Times, As contemporary art often does, the giant crack in the floor at the Tate Modern here inspires different responses from different people.

Some might agree with the Tate that the work, Doris Salcedo’s “Shibboleth,” concerns “the divisions between creed, color, class and culture that maintain our social order, precariously balanced as it is on the precipice of a chaotic void of hatred.” Others might feel that, as a visitor named Peter Lord said the other day, “there’s some kind of meaning behind it, although I don’t know what.”

And then there are those who trip on the crack and hurt themselves. The Times of London reported that 15 people suffered minor injuries in the first eight weeks after “Shibboleth” opened in October in the Turbine Hall, Tate Modern’s vast signature space. The newspaper cited museum records it obtained in a search under Britain’s Freedom of Information Act. The work will be on view until April 6.

The newspaper’s revelation gave the exhibit a certain degree of notoriety: What was this dangerous work of art? But when they see it for themselves, members of the gallery-going public tend to have two responses. First, they are relieved that the Tate has resisted the British trend toward removing the risk from even mundane pursuits. Second, they are astonished that anyone could encounter risk in “Shibboleth” in the first place.

“How dim would you have to be?” Mark Knight, a 41-year-old nurse from Ipswich, asked rhetorically the other day.

“‘Oh, no, I wasn’t expecting the crack to be there,”’ Mr. Knight whined, imagining the inner monologue of an injured party. “‘There’s a crack there, but hey, when I put my foot in there, I didn’t expect to trip in it.’” The installation is some 500 feet long and, at its widest point, less than a foot across. It looks like an earthquake’s jagged fault line or a fissure brought on by prolonged drought. The museum has been coy about how Ms. Salcedo, a celebrated Colombian artist, actually did the work, but it has revealed that it involved opening up the Turbine Hall floor “in order to create a cavity.”

“Shibboleth” takes its title from the Old Testament story in which the ability to pronounce the word was used by the victorious Gileadites as a test to identify members of the tribe of Ephraim who were trying to sneak back into their home territory. Those who couldn’t say it correctly were revealed as Ephraimites and killed.

The work is the eighth in the popular Unilever Series on the Tate’s enormous ground floor. It is not the first to raise safety concerns: the previous installation, which involved huge tubes that people slid through, was said to have needed extra cushioning after some members of the opening-night crowd were catapulted too precipitously onto the floor.

In a statement the gallery said that “there have been 10 reported incidents in the Turbine Hall” since “Shibboleth” opened. It added that more than 870,000 people had visited the work, and that none had been badly hurt.

“We take issues of health and safety very seriously,” the gallery said.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>